Victorious Surrender:
An Open Letter to the Worship Groups of the
Episcopal Church in South Carolina
October 6, 2013
My Friends,
As a member of a “worship group,” you
probably spent this Sunday morning as I did, helping to set up and then break
down a temporary Episcopal Church in a rented space. Maybe you hung the “Episcopal
Church Welcomes You” sign, unloaded hymnals from the trunk of a car, or plugged
in a portable keyboard. A few miles away, the church building in which you used
to worship still stands, no longer connected to The Episcopal Church. On that
building the word “Episcopal” has been inexpertly effaced. The Episcopal shield
has been pried from the very structure, leaving something like a wound.
On most Sundays, our joy of being free
of the negativity and division that for so long shrouded our diocese competes
with rootless anxiety. Worship groups are tenants, with leases subject to
change. We get bumped from the schedule when our landlords need the space. We
update our websites when we change addresses. From lining up supply priests to
storing reserved sacrament in the absence of a tabernacle, worship groups
manage week-to-week. We've been reminded how little we need, and how easily we
had allowed non-essentials to encrust our faith, like barnacles on a ship. (I
should substitute “dock” for “ship,” in deference to the worship group at
Okatie, which did for a time worship on a dock. I still repeat their joke about
“casting bread upon the waters.”)
Resentment is tempting. Why should
we be reduced to rented sanctuaries and makeshift altars simply because we
wanted to remain Episcopalian? A man moves here from California, decides The
Episcopal Church no longer suits him, and we’re the ones told to hit the
bricks? Why has his decision to leave our
church left us in this bind?
Resentment? We should give thanks. Leaving our buildings
has been a blessing, and losing them for good would be a godsend.
As worship groups, we have paid a
price for our loyalty to The Episcopal Church, and therefore we’ve earned the
right to tell our leaders that we object to the ruinous and expensive legal
battle being waged on our behalf. Let us
win through surrender.
For those still bitter over packed
vestries and secret standing committees, surrender might be cleansing. Some of
us walked away from buildings in which we were baptized, married, and confirmed.
We left the names of loved ones on brass plaques attached to donated pews. We
served on building campaigns that raised money for churches that we are no
longer allowed to use. We painted the narthex, mended the roof, and helped
install the playground.
But when two children are fighting
on that playground we helped build, with a single toy in both their grasps, the
one that lets go first has control. The one who lets go first chose to let go, and at that moment the toy
loses its value. The kid who doesn’t let go often ends up on his butt, crying
over his hollow victory. The toy’s power springs from its desirability.
What if we let go first?
When we refuse to fight for property,
we escape the temptation to worship the space, rather than in the space.
Those buildings are tombs. In them are buried all the good works that can’t be
accomplished by congregations enslaved by facilities. Refusing to fight for
property is not a sign of weakness, but of the kind of strength that says,
“Take this building. We have a better refuge and a stronger fortress.”
In the twenty-first century, The
Episcopal Church in South Carolina is no longer the establishment church, no
longer “The Republican Party at prayer.” Each worship group is a ragged
extended family of “indiscriminate inclusivity.” Giving up those buildings is a
gesture that suits our new identity – missionary, underdog, stripped-down,
self-reliant Christians, tolerant to a fault. Heck, tolerant past fault. So
tolerant it drives some folks up a wall. So recklessly tolerant that we might
occasionally go too far, but knowing full well that the grave danger is not
going far enough.
Yes, in some cases we would be
giving up prominent symbols of Christianity in our communities. Many of us
would be saying goodbye beautiful churches that have stood for decades (or
centuries), with steeples that assert respectable religiosity. The prestige building
is a sign of worldly success, the right church for polite company, the correct
church to join if you want to advance socially.
We worship groups are called to be
the wrong church. To join a church
that meets in a barbecue restaurant (as the worship group in Edisto did for a
while) is to join a church that grants no social advantage. God’s gentle lesson
– replacing Edisto’s pretty white church with a pig-picking joint – is directed
at us all. We are not able to point to a lovely building and say “That’s our
church.” We’ll have to point to the world instead.
Today’s lectionary included a reading
from Habakkuk. It starts with the prophet complaining, but turns to a call for
perseverance:
I will stand
at my watchpost,
and station myself on the rampart;
I will keep
watch to see what he will say to me,
and what he will answer concerning my complaint. (2:1-4)
We've been assigned our watchposts: St.
Francis Episcopal Church in West Ashley worships in a funeral home. St. Catherine’s
in Florence meets in a school. The Episcopal Church in Myrtle Beach is already
in its third location, having moved from a back porch to a rented classroom to
a building on loan from the Methodists. The Church of the Good Shepherd in
Summerville and the East Cooper Episcopalians are also borrowing space from the
Methodists. (Thank God for the Methodists!) These are not the watchposts we would choose, but
we are called to keep watch nonetheless.
If after a season we find our mission would be served by owning our own buildings, we will have arrived
at that point after a worthwhile (if occasionally inconvenient) period in
relative wilderness. We will have to buy or build those watchposts on our own, and
we’ll enter them after we’ve been thoroughly reminded that we should view property
as a sharp tool –potentially useful, but dangerous to the careless. We’ll be
wiser; perhaps wise enough to pity and love those who now appear to be “winning.”
So by letting go – letting all that
brick and mortar pass into hands more desperate than ours – we win. We fulfill
the promises made at baptism and embraced at confirmation. We avoid a decade of
claims and counter-claims with those with whom we used to worship. We devote
our resources to the Great Commission, not great attorneys. We can be both in
the right and willing to be wronged.
The property under dispute in our
diocese is the second-place trophy in the only race that matters. Wouldn’t we
rather come in first?
Regards,
Dan Ennis
Senior Warden
St. Anne's Episcopal Church, Conway
Moving and convincing!
ReplyDeleteConversation at the Cafe is getting heated...
ReplyDeletehttp://www.episcopalcafe.com/lead/episcopal_church/property_litigation_what_if_we.html
Outstanding! Sounds exactly like all those Episcopalians who lost their property to The Episcopal Church from California to Connecticut. A reminder to all To Whom the Church really belongs.
ReplyDeleteWho are the underdogs in Upper SC? Just curious.
ReplyDeleteMust feel a lot like what Catholics in the British Isles felt like after the Protestant Reformation, when the usurpers stole the churches and Cathedrals that their Catholic forefathers had built, or destroyed them altogether and gave the land to the lackeys of the King.
ReplyDeleteThe buildings of the parishes of the Diocese of South Carolina are in good hands of their rightful owners. Those who left were not thrown out but they decided to leave. They could have remained part of their parishes but decided not to- their choice. I gather now that the *shoe is on the other foot* so to speak, it ain't so comfortable. Lets not forget who sued many parishes to claim properties (TEC) and let us also not forget who has NOT sued to claim properties (Bishop Lawrence and the Diocese of SC). No one has sued Grace Church in Charleston to claim ownership of the property. In fact, Bishop Lawrence said go and take your properties with you which they did. It is just that 80 % of the diocese's membership decided to stay put with Bishop Lawrence. SO the 20% is now looking for a place to worship. Perhaps being without a building is not all it is cracked up to be. I guess the old attitude of *Don't forget to leave the keys on your way out* is not so comfy when YOU are the one leaving.
ReplyDelete